The judge concluded that Biden breached several sections of the Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct, including provisions that bar âdishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.â The ruling also took into account Bidenâs disbarment in Washington, D.C., ordered in May under similar circumstances.
Background of criminal cases
Bidenâs professional troubles trace back to two separate federal matters. In October 2024, a Delaware jury found him guilty of three felony counts tied to the purchase of a revolver in 2018. Prosecutors said he falsely affirmed on a federal form that he was not using illegal drugs, despite what they described as ongoing substance abuse. Shortly after sentencing, then-President Biden issued a full pardon.
Biden also faced a tax prosecution in the Central District of California. Federal authorities alleged he failed to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. A trial was scheduled for September 2024, but hours after jury selection was set to begin, Biden agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file and a felony count of tax evasion. Those convictions were likewise covered by the presidential pardon.
While a pardon eliminates criminal penalties, it does not automatically remove the disciplinary consequences lawyers face for conduct considered incompatible with the professionâs ethical standards. According to the American Bar Association, state licensing authorities retain full authority to impose sanctionsâranging from reprimands to disbarmentâwhen an attorneyâs behavior undermines public confidence in the legal system.
Details of the Connecticut proceeding
Mondayâs hearing focused narrowly on whether Hunter Bidenâs admitted misconduct warranted the most serious disciplinary outcome. Judge Carroll accepted the joint stipulation, emphasizing in the written order that the Connecticut barâs integrity ârequires swift and decisive actionâ when an attorneyâs behavior contradicts core ethical duties.
Bidenâs disbarment is permanent unless he successfully applies for readmission, a process that cannot begin for several years and would require him to demonstrate rehabilitation and fitness to practice. His lawyer did not indicate whether Biden plans to seek reinstatement in the future.
The Connecticut ruling cites Bidenâs federal convictions, the nature of the underlying conduct, and the prior disbarment in Washington, D.C. as aggravating factors. Mitigating considerations, such as his cooperation with the disciplinary process and the presidential pardon, were noted but ultimately deemed insufficient to avoid disbarment.
Legal career and education
Hunter Biden, 55, was admitted to the Connecticut bar in 1997 one year after graduating from Yale Law School. His legal career included work in private practice and as a lobbyist, as well as roles on the boards of several organizations. Before Mondayâs order, his ability to practice had already been suspended pending the disciplinary case.
The outcome further narrows Bidenâs professional options following a period marked by legal and personal challenges. While the White House has not commented on the Connecticut decision, the matter is now largely closed unless Biden pursues an appeal or later seeks readmission.
Crédito da imagem: Associated Press