Industrial Materials Lag Raises Questions About Sustainability of Precious-Metal Rally

Record prices for gold and silver have dominated the opening weeks of 2026, yet a key segment of the equity market is flashing a warning signal that the precious-metal surge may be detached from underlying economic conditions.

Precious metals soar to new highs

Gold futures for February delivery (GCG26) and silver futures for March delivery (SIH26) have vaulted to unprecedented levels in a parabolic move that gathered momentum throughout January. Investors have increased exposure to the metals as a hedge against a weakening U.S. dollar index ($DXY) and as protection from geopolitical uncertainty. The rally has also benefited selected mining companies, particularly gold producer Newmont Corp. and copper giant Freeport-McMoRan, both of which are constituents of the S&P 500 Materials Sector SPDR exchange-traded fund (XLB).

Materials ETF fails to confirm the advance

Despite the strength in bullion, XLB has failed to keep pace with the broader S&P 500 Index. Since the start of the year, the fund has traded in a narrow band just below its 200-day moving average and remains capped by resistance established in late 2025. The ETF holds companies that deliver the basic inputs for global manufacturing, including chemicals, construction supplies, and industrial metals such as copper and aluminum. Chemical producer Linde PLC represents the largest weight, followed by Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan.

In a typical expansionary environment, higher prices for gold and silver coincide with gains in industrial materials, reflecting robust demand for commodities used in construction, technology, and consumer goods. The current decoupling suggests that investors are purchasing precious metals primarily for defensive reasons rather than in response to stronger economic activity.

Profit pressure on chemical and construction suppliers

Chemical manufacturers and construction-materials producers account for roughly two-thirds of XLB’s portfolio. Many names in these segments face margin compression from rising energy expenses and sluggish order flow. Recent manufacturing surveys point to slowing output and softer new-order growth. Data from the Federal Reserve’s industrial production report showed a sequential decline in factory activity during the fourth quarter of 2025, echoing the challenges now reflected in share-price performance.

The disparity between surging bullion prices and lagging industrial materials has historical precedent. Episodes in which precious metals rise sharply while activity-sensitive commodities underperform often coincide with market anxiety about currency stability or geopolitical risk rather than with broad-based economic strength. When those concerns subside, the premium embedded in gold and silver can erode quickly.

Technical picture underscores the split

The relative weakness of XLB is visible on several technical measures. The ETF’s price has struggled to hold above its 50-day moving average and remains below the 200-day trendline. Momentum indicators, such as the Percentage Price Oscillator, sit in neutral territory, contrasting with elevated readings for gold and silver futures, which are deeply overbought on many oscillators.

Market strategists often examine the relationship between precious metals and industrial materials to gauge the balance between fear-based and growth-driven demand. At present, the S&P 500 continues to be powered by a handful of technology shares, while economically sensitive groups—including materials—trade sideways. The divergence implies that investors may be positioning defensively even as headline equity indices hover near record levels.

Imagem: financial planning 71

Implications for diversified portfolios

For portfolio managers and individual investors, the split offers both cautionary and tactical insights. On one hand, the metals rally provides short-term relief for holders of Newmont, Freeport-McMoRan, and other precious-metal miners. On the other hand, softness across chemical and construction suppliers suggests that demand for raw inputs is not accelerating. If industrial metals fail to participate in the upswing, the current enthusiasm for gold and silver could encounter an exhaustion point once safe-haven buying subsides.

An additional factor is the recent advance in energy stocks, which has partially offset weakness in other cyclical areas. Higher crude-oil prices can lift revenue for integrated producers but also elevate costs for materials manufacturers, further pressuring margins. Whether energy strength can counterbalance a potential peak in precious-metal prices remains uncertain.

Key dates and indicators to watch

The next several weeks may determine whether the divergence persists or begins to close. Investors will monitor:

• Fourth-quarter earnings reports from major chemical companies, which could clarify the extent of cost inflation and demand trends.
• Monthly manufacturing purchasing managers’ indexes for clues on new-order momentum.
• Updates on the U.S. dollar’s trajectory, which directly influences bullion pricing.
• Federal Reserve communications regarding interest-rate policy, a critical driver of both currency and commodity markets.

If industrial materials shares start to outperform, the move would indicate improving economic confidence and may legitimize part of the precious-metal rally. Conversely, continued underperformance would reinforce the view that gold and silver gains are speculative and vulnerable to a rapid reversal once risk sentiment shifts.

Crédito da imagem: Barchart