Nations Examine Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban as a Possible Template

The decision by Australia to bar children under 16 from opening accounts on major social media platforms is prompting policymakers on several continents to explore adopting comparable measures. Since the Online Safety Amendment Act took effect on 10 December, companies such as TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit and X have been required to verify users’ ages before allowing registration. Firms that fail to comply face penalties of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (roughly US$32 million).

Pressure Builds Beyond Australia

Although the legislation is less than a month old, its influence is already evident. Government officials in the United Kingdom, France, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Italy and Greece have confirmed that bills or preliminary drafts are under review to introduce age-based restrictions similar to Australia’s. In London, momentum is especially strong: members of the House of Lords are expected to vote this week on an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill that would prohibit under-16s from joining social networks in the country.

Advocacy groups argue that prohibitions at a uniform age threshold are among the clearest options available for addressing concerns over mental health, cyberbullying and exposure to harmful content. Smartphone Free Childhood, a U.K.-based campaign urging parents to defer smartphone ownership for youngsters, reported that more than 100,000 constituents contacted lawmakers in recent days to support a nationwide ban.

Industry Pushback and Legal Challenges

Technology companies have greeted the Australian rules with a mixture of compliance statements and objections. Reddit filed a lawsuit contending that mandatory age verification infringes on free expression by limiting political discussion. Meta, the parent of Facebook and Instagram, has asked Canberra to reconsider the policy framework, while X told users in a system message that the restrictions were implemented solely to meet statutory obligations.

Executives warn that cross-border fragmentation of online safety laws could complicate global operations. The industry generally favors voluntary parental-control tools and broader digital literacy initiatives rather than outright bans. However, legislators counter that self-regulation has not prevented rising reports of anxiety, depression and other mental-health concerns linked to heavy social-media use among adolescents.

United Kingdom Weighs Next Steps

In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said officials are studying Australia’s model while keeping all policy options open. The government is simultaneously reviewing screen-time guidelines for children under five, reflecting broader worries about device exposure in early childhood education. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has invited experts on youth development to brief civil servants on the potential benefits of stricter limits.

If the House of Lords amends the pending bill, the United Kingdom could become the first European country to adopt an under-16 ban. Supporters believe that simultaneous adoption across multiple nations would lessen peer pressure on teenagers to remain online, thereby making the prohibition easier to enforce.

State-Level Action Likely in the United States

A nationwide restriction in the United States appears unlikely in the near term because of constitutional and political hurdles, yet several state legislatures are moving independently. Lawmakers in California and Texas have signaled plans to introduce proposals that would take effect as early as 2026. Observers cite rare bipartisan agreement on child online safety, though past efforts to regulate digital platforms have often stalled in Congress.

Legal scholars note that any U.S. measure must navigate First Amendment considerations and avoid conflicting with federal statutes such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. Still, state experiments could serve as test cases for broader adoption if they withstand judicial scrutiny.

Imagem: financial planning 73

France and Other European Initiatives

In Paris, legislators are debating two separate bills that would block access to social networks for users under 15. One of the texts has support from President Emmanuel Macron’s party, and the national public-health agency ANSES recently catalogued what it described as numerous documented harms associated with prolonged social-media use. Elsewhere in the European Union, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Italy and Greece have each opened consultations or drafted discussion papers regarding minimum-age requirements.

European officials must also take into account existing regional regulations, including the Digital Services Act, which sets standards for online platforms operating in the bloc. Any new national laws would need to align with that framework while addressing local concerns.

Rationale Behind Age Verification

Proponents of age-based prohibitions contend that widespread adoption could reset social norms, reducing the perceived necessity for adolescents to maintain an online presence. If under-16s face uniform restrictions, advocates argue, individual teenagers would no longer feel compelled to join platforms simply to stay connected with peers. Policymakers hope the shift would mitigate negative mental-health outcomes, encourage face-to-face interaction and allow additional time for research into safe design standards.

Compliance hinges on reliable age-verification technologies. Australia’s law allows photo-matching, government-issued identification checks and third-party verification services. Critics worry about data security and the potential for increased surveillance, while supporters maintain that privacy-preserving methods can be implemented without storing personally identifiable information.

Next Milestones

Global interest is expected to intensify as early enforcement data emerges from Australia. Regulators will monitor sign-up rates, mental-health indicators and corporate response to assess effectiveness. The upcoming vote in the U.K. House of Lords, ongoing debates in the French National Assembly and drafts circulating in several U.S. statehouses will offer additional signals on whether Australia’s approach becomes an international benchmark.

Crédito da imagem: Getty Images News