Oracle Bond Prices Slide as Market Reacts to Prospect of $38 Billion AI-Related Debt

Oracle Corp. bonds have come under renewed pressure after reports indicated the company intends to assume approximately $38 billion in additional debt to accelerate spending on cloud and artificial-intelligence infrastructure. The move, disclosed in market commentary late last week, has heightened investor focus on the software maker’s already substantial leverage and its strategy of financing capital expenditures while maintaining shareholder-return programs.

The debt-funded spending plan surfaced days after a report by CNBC outlined Oracle’s intention to raise tens of billions of dollars for data-center expansion and AI hardware. Since that report, prices of several Oracle bond issues have declined, lifting yields and widening credit-risk perceptions.

Pressure on Specific Bond Issues

Market data show that Oracle’s 4.90% notes maturing in 2033 lost ground over the last two weeks, pushing the yield more than three basis points higher. A newer series of 4.80% notes due in 2032 recorded an almost two-basis-point rise in yield within one week. Dealers and portfolio managers described a noticeable uptick in selling, although volumes remained well inside their 2023 peaks.

Oracle currently carries roughly $104 billion of total debt, including about $18 billion in bonds. If the company proceeds with the contemplated $38 billion issuance, outstanding obligations would climb above $140 billion, placing Oracle among the most leveraged U.S. investment-grade technology issuers. The company has not publicly confirmed the new financing and did not answer requests for comment.

Strategic Spending Outpaces Operating Cash Flow

Oracle has invested aggressively in 2024 and 2025 to expand its cloud footprint and secure capacity for AI workloads. Capital expenditures have exceeded operating cash flow, prompting management to rely on debt markets. Analysts note that the strategy mirrors actions by other large technology firms that are simultaneously repurchasing shares and pouring funds into data-center construction.

According to Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, many mega-cap technology companies are juggling buyback commitments with historically high capital-expenditure budgets and are turning to bond issuance to cover the gap. The approach aims to preserve equity valuations while financing infrastructure viewed as critical to long-term growth.

Investor Debate on Profitability and Risk

Some fixed-income managers view Oracle’s approach as manageable, citing diversified cash flows from database licensing, cloud subscriptions, and consulting services. Others are more cautious, questioning the timeline for earnings contributions from AI contracts with customers such as OpenAI and newer startups.

Chilton Trust’s fixed-income division indicated that, in its assessment, Oracle retains several levers—such as slowing repurchases or trimming dividends—to protect credit metrics if free cash flow remains under pressure. Nonetheless, the recent bond-price movement suggests a faction of the market is scrutinizing the balance between shareholder rewards and debt accumulation.

Imagem: financial planning 7

Broader Skepticism Toward AI-Driven Spending

The debate reaches beyond Oracle. Prominent value investor Michael Burry has argued that multiple technology giants, including Oracle, Microsoft, and Alphabet’s Google, have quietly extended depreciation schedules to smooth reported earnings while channeling large sums toward AI development. Although Burry’s critique addresses accounting rather than liquidity, it has contributed to a wider conversation about whether AI investments will yield returns fast enough to justify current spending levels.

Industry observers point out that the cost of AI infrastructure—spanning advanced semiconductors, cooling systems, and specialized networking gear—can surpass traditional data-center budgets by a significant margin. According to a recent International Energy Agency study, rapidly expanding AI and cloud workloads are set to boost global data-center electricity demand by almost 30% between 2022 and 2026, underscoring the scale of required investment.

Market Context and Outlook

Despite the latest sell-off, Oracle’s bonds remain investment grade, and spreads versus comparable U.S. Treasuries are still narrower than the average for BBB issuers. Traders attribute part of the widening to seasonal liquidity as well as headline sensitivity linked to large debt-financed transactions.

Rating agencies have not updated their outlooks in response to the reported plan, though analysts say any formal announcement could prompt reviews if leverage ratios exceed previously communicated thresholds. Oracle’s most recent quarterly filing showed net debt-to-EBITDA levels approaching 3.5 times, a figure that could move higher if the company takes on the full $38 billion without a commensurate rise in earnings.

For now, attention centers on the company’s next earnings release and any guidance regarding capital expenditures, share buybacks, and financing strategy. Bondholders are expected to monitor cash-flow trends, contract wins in AI services, and management’s willingness to adjust shareholder-return policies.

Crédito da imagem: Reuters